![]() If I’d worked on small clips with the 4K then downsized before trying to put it together I might have got some benefit. The size of the 4K video made it very slow to process even on quite a decent computer, so I didn’t really get much of a benefit from 4K as I had to downsize it before I could do anything with it. ![]() My first big trip with the Session 5 gave a lot better footage than the year before with the 4, so it is a definite improvement. While there was much more I could do with the Session 4, I was always a bit disappointed with the results. Removing the lens distortion with software improves it, but you can still tell the footage was from a GoPro.įor accessories, I haven’t used the adhesive mounts, but have bought a flotation stick which the camera is usually on, a clip for attaching to my belt or rucksack strap (still to try), and a gecko mount – which looks cool but haven’t used much yet either. The GoPro lens distortion means that you can’t really use it for a full video without the viewer getting tired of the format and videos need to include footage from different format lens. ![]() Even if you aren’t into action photography, do you have other subjects that you might find it useful for? Quite soon I wanted the 4K from the Hero5.Īs an introduction to the GoPro line, the Sessions will quickly make you realize if this is a type of camera that you will use. This gave no opportunity to crop the image without looking poor quality and restricted any after-camera stabilization or distortion correction. The main problem with the Session 4 being being poor low light image quality, not great quality stills, and it being mainly designed for 1080p, (though you can increase this with a slower frame rate). Starting with the GoPro Hero Session 4, I then moved onto the Hero Session 5 a year later.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |